🧪 Add dedicated tests for WebsurfxQuery builder - #25
Conversation
This adds dedicated test cases for `with_safe_search` and `with_page` in `src/websurfx.rs`, improving test coverage for the builder pattern per user request. Co-authored-by: undivisible <136312656+undivisible@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
🎯 What: The testing gap addressed is the missing isolated tests for the
with_safe_searchandwith_pagebuilders onWebsurfxQuery.📊 Coverage: The scenarios now tested involve calling each builder and verifying that the internal property is mutated correctly.
✨ Result: The improvement ensures builder logic for
WebsurfxQueryremains intact across refactors.PR created automatically by Jules for task 13495370272218540200 started by @undivisible
Note
Low Risk
Test-only change with no modifications to production code or runtime behavior.
Overview
Adds two unit tests in
websurfx.rsthat exerciseWebsurfxQuerybuilders one at a time:sets_safe_search_level_on_querycheckswith_safe_search(4)setssafe_search()toSome(4), andsets_page_on_querycheckswith_page(2)setspage()toSome(2).Existing
gets_websurfx_query_propertiesalready chains both builders; these tests lock in each setter independently so refactors are less likely to break builder behavior without a focused failure.Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 47d13aa. Configure here.