Skip to content

feat: Reusable Knip and Jest Workflows - Bounty #13 ($1200)#66

Open
zhaog100 wants to merge 1 commit into
ubiquity-os:developmentfrom
zhaog100:feat/reusable-workflows
Open

feat: Reusable Knip and Jest Workflows - Bounty #13 ($1200)#66
zhaog100 wants to merge 1 commit into
ubiquity-os:developmentfrom
zhaog100:feat/reusable-workflows

Conversation

@zhaog100
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@zhaog100 zhaog100 commented Apr 8, 2026

Reusable Knip and Jest Workflows

Bounty: #13 | Reward: $1200

Changes

  • Converted Knip workflow to reusable (workflow_call)
  • Converted Jest workflow to reusable (workflow_call)
  • Configurable: node-version, package-manager, working-directory
  • Supports bun, yarn, npm package managers
  • Full documentation for consumers in docs/reusable-workflows.md
  • Updated README with reusable workflows section

Usage from other repos

jobs:
  knip:
    uses: ubiquity-os/plugin-template/.github/workflows/knip.yml@main
  test:
    uses: ubiquity-os/plugin-template/.github/workflows/jest-testing.yml@main
    with:
      package-manager: yarn

Files changed

  • .github/workflows/knip.yml — Added workflow_call trigger with inputs
  • .github/workflows/jest-testing.yml — Added workflow_call trigger with inputs
  • docs/reusable-workflows.md — New documentation
  • README.md — Added reusable workflows section

- Knip workflow now supports workflow_call with configurable inputs
- Jest workflow now supports workflow_call with configurable inputs
- Supports bun, yarn, npm package managers
- Documentation for usage from other repos

Bounty: ubiquity-os#13 - Reusable Knip/Jest Workflows ($1200)
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented Apr 8, 2026

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@zhaog100 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 29 minutes and 24 seconds before requesting another review.

Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 29 minutes and 24 seconds.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 00e58ab0-b581-40b7-a908-bf91b05b762c

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 349787d and 920bd5f.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • .github/workflows/jest-testing.yml
  • .github/workflows/knip.yml
  • README.md
  • docs/reusable-workflows.md
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@zhaog100
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Hi @gentlementlegen, just a friendly ping on this PR. Happy to address any feedback or make adjustments if needed. Thanks for your time! 🙏

@zhaog100
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Hi @gentlementlegen 👋

Friendly follow-up on this PR (created 20 days ago). The reusable Knip and Jest workflows are ready for review.

Summary:

  • Converted Knip + Jest workflows to workflow_call
  • Supports bun, yarn, npm
  • Full documentation included

Let me know if any changes are needed. Happy to address feedback! 🙏

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant