Skip to content
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ Longitudinal study where 10 adults completed standardized psychology tests acros

## Key findings

There's high variability between people (everyone responds quite differently during testing) but low variability within each person across sessions (each individual's physiological pattern stays pretty consistent). This suggests these responses reflect stable individual traits rather than just random fluctuation.
How stable are these patterns within a person across sessions? A test–retest reliability check (ICC(1), n = 10, 3 sessions) on the committed summaries gives ICC = 0.22 for HRV SDNN, 0.45 for pupil-dilation variability, and 0.61 for response-duration variability — poor for the physiological measures, moderate at best. So the data do **not** support a strong "stable individual traits" reading: with only 10 participants, these measures look closer to session-to-session fluctuation than to reliable traits. Any stability claim should be read as tentative and underpowered.

![Correlation matrix of HRV SDNN and Pupil Dilation STD across sessions](images/correlation_heatmap_with_values_final.png)

Expand Down
Loading