Skip to content

Changes to Organization types and preferences#99

Draft
lennertvandevelde wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
kg-379-org-types-and-prefs
Draft

Changes to Organization types and preferences#99
lennertvandevelde wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
kg-379-org-types-and-prefs

Conversation

@lennertvandevelde

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@lennertvandevelde lennertvandevelde changed the title KG-379 Add HeritageDatabasePartner as Org Type Changes to Organization types and preferences Jun 4, 2025
skos:inScheme <https://data.hetarchief.be/id/organization-preferences> .

<visitor-space-publication> a skos:Concept ;
<the-archive-visitor-space-publication> a skos:Concept ;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changed to align with other preferences

"Aanduiding of de organisatie toestemming wenst te geven om de eigen digitale objecten te gebruiken voor educatieve doeleinden op onderwijs.hetarchief.be."@nl ;
skos:inScheme <https://data.hetarchief.be/id/organization-preferences> .

<iiif-publication> a skos:Concept ;

@lennertvandevelde lennertvandevelde Jun 4, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

dissemination -> publication
Alignment + I feel that dissemination is not really the right fit:
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/dissemination

the act of spreading news, information, ideas, etc. to a lot of people

We are not really spreading it, just providing access to, but maybe publication is also not the right definition then? 🤷

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree, publication is better. In the rights datamodel we actually used 'make available'

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I will look at aligning these better with these with the rights model as well.

@lennertvandevelde lennertvandevelde requested a review from mielvds June 4, 2025 14:41
@mielvds mielvds force-pushed the main branch 2 times, most recently from 2b10249 to b13d85d Compare December 4, 2025 09:24
@lennertvandevelde lennertvandevelde marked this pull request as draft June 17, 2026 11:15
@lennertvandevelde

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Converted to draft, since there will be some new changes (skryv exit and "dienstenformulier" integration in "partnerportaal")

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants