Optimize buffer ops #8322
Optimize buffer ops #8322
2 benchmarks regressed
⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected
Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.
For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.
⚠️ Different runtime environments detected
Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.
⚡ 20 improved benchmarks
❌ 2 regressed benchmarks
✅ 1510 untouched benchmarks
Warning
Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | Simulation | chunked_bool_canonical_into[(1000, 10)] |
20.2 µs | 34.5 µs | -41.34% |
| ❌ | Simulation | chunked_varbinview_canonical_into[(100, 100)] |
274.4 µs | 309.8 µs | -11.41% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | slice_empty_vortex |
2,599.4 ns | 368.3 ns | ×7.1 |
| ⚡ | Simulation | append_buffer_vortex_buffer[65536] |
95.4 µs | 27 µs | ×3.5 |
| ⚡ | Simulation | append_buffer_vortex_buffer[16384] |
32 µs | 12.9 µs | ×2.5 |
| ⚡ | Simulation | append_buffer_vortex_buffer[128] |
11.6 µs | 5.4 µs | ×2.2 |
| ⚡ | Simulation | append_buffer_vortex_buffer[1024] |
13.6 µs | 8.5 µs | +61.24% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | slice_vortex_buffer[1024] |
1,276.7 ns | 813.1 ns | +57.02% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | slice_vortex_buffer[16384] |
1,276.7 ns | 813.1 ns | +57.02% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | slice_vortex_buffer[2048] |
1,276.7 ns | 813.1 ns | +57.02% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | slice_vortex_buffer[128] |
1,276.7 ns | 813.1 ns | +57.02% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | slice_vortex_buffer[65536] |
1,276.7 ns | 813.1 ns | +57.02% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | append_buffer_vortex_buffer[2048] |
11.4 µs | 7.9 µs | +45.37% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | search_index_below_min_chunked |
1.5 ms | 1.3 ms | +15.71% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | search_index_mixed_out_of_range_chunked |
1.5 ms | 1.3 ms | +15.27% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | search_index_full_range_random_chunked |
1.6 ms | 1.4 ms | +13.51% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | compare[6] |
79.3 µs | 70 µs | +13.31% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | compare[6] |
79 µs | 69.8 µs | +13.11% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | compare[6] |
80.7 µs | 71.4 µs | +12.94% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | compare[5] |
75.9 µs | 68.5 µs | +10.83% |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.
Tip
Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing adamg/buffer-slice-fast (ae9bc12) with develop (3d7bbfb)
