Skip to content

QuantumScan — Post-Quantum Cryptography Scanner for Substrate/Polkadot#2773

Closed
gaiabio12-design wants to merge 5 commits into
w3f:masterfrom
gaiabio12-design:quantumscan-pqc-scanner
Closed

QuantumScan — Post-Quantum Cryptography Scanner for Substrate/Polkadot#2773
gaiabio12-design wants to merge 5 commits into
w3f:masterfrom
gaiabio12-design:quantumscan-pqc-scanner

Conversation

@gaiabio12-design

Copy link
Copy Markdown

TL;DR

QuantumScan is a live, open-source PQC scanner (MIT) that detects quantum-vulnerable cryptographic patterns across 15+ languages. We're requesting Level 2 funding to build Substrate/Polkadot-specific deep detection and migration tooling.

Live product: https://quantumscan.io
Scanner CLI: https://github.com/quantumscan-io/scanner-core
223 scans completed since January 2026, zero external funding.

Key facts

  • Detects sr25519, ed25519-dalek, x25519-dalek, sp-core patterns (already implemented)
  • Privacy-first: code never leaves developer environment, only findings reach backend
  • No existing open-source tool audits Substrate codebases at code level for quantum exposure
  • Commercial alternatives cost $50,000+/year

Deliverables summary

Milestone 1 (2 months, $15k): Substrate deep pattern expansion — BABE/GRANDPA key detection, pallet scanner, XCM signing audit, ink! smart contract scanner, cargo quantumscan plugin

Milestone 2 (2 months, $15k): PQC migration tooling — per-finding migration guides (sr25519 → ML-DSA-65), CBOM per pallet, Substrate GitHub Action template, public Polkadot ecosystem dashboard at quantumscan.io/polkadot

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the admin-review This application requires a review from an admin. label Jun 24, 2026
@gaiabio12-design

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA.

@gaiabio12-design

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

I have read and hereby sign the Contributor License Agreement.

@gaiabio12-design

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Closing this Level 2 application in favor of a more focused Level 1 submission. After reviewing the W3F grant guidelines and ecosystem feedback, we believe a Level 1 proposal better matches our current stage — solo founder, first W3F grant, existing product already proving the concept. A Level 1 PR will follow shortly with a tighter scope and the same technical rigor. Thank you for your patience.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

admin-review This application requires a review from an admin.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant