Skip to content

⚡ Bolt: Hoist redundant LINQ queries in BuildCandidateRoutes#261

Open
google-labs-jules[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
perf-hoist-linq-build-candidate-routes-1703574605867944453
Open

⚡ Bolt: Hoist redundant LINQ queries in BuildCandidateRoutes#261
google-labs-jules[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
perf-hoist-linq-build-candidate-routes-1703574605867944453

Conversation

@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

💡 What: Hoisted the LINQ queries for context.Supply and context.Demand into pre-calculated lists before entering the nested loops in BuildCandidateRoutes.

🎯 Why: The context.Demand query was being re-evaluated for every producer node, resulting in redundant $O(N \times M)$ allocations and CPU cycles for filtering and projection.

📊 Impact: Reduces LINQ evaluation and allocation complexity from $O(N \times M)$ to $O(N + M)$ per BuildCandidateRoutes invocation. This significantly lowers GC pressure and execution time in the simulation engine's bottleneck, which is called repeatedly during global capacity bidding.

🔬 Measurement: Full benchmarks were impractical due to 400s timeouts in the current CI environment for NuGet restore and build processes. The improvement is justified by the reduction in redundant work within a nested loop on a hot execution path.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 1703574605867944453 started by @wnj00524

The LINQ query on `context.Demand` was being re-evaluated for every iteration of the outer producer loop. This led to O(N*M) LINQ evaluations and allocations. By hoisting both supply and demand queries into pre-materialized lists, we reduce the complexity to O(N+M) per call, significantly reducing GC pressure and CPU overhead in the simulation engine's hot path.
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants