Add project Code of Conduct - #86
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
0.6.0update in the synthetic GitLab example by deriving its checksum URL and wheel install path from the single version pin;.release-version.Why
The repository did not publish a Code of Conduct or a private route for conduct incidents. Separately, the previous example-version update changed only
OCR_TOOLKIT_VERSION, leaving its checksum URL and installation filename pinned to an older release. This pull request closes both documentation consistency gaps without changing runtime behavior or publishing stable artifacts.Validation
scripts/quality.sh check— 766 passed, 99 subtests, 81.12% branch coveragescripts/gitleaks.shv0.6.0SHA256SUMSwheel entryChanged boundaries
Community governance/documentation and the public synthetic GitLab installation example. No runtime parser, persistence, Git, subprocess, provider mutation, reporting, or release-publication boundary changes.
Security and compatibility impact
Conduct reports are directed away from public issues to an existing confidential GitHub channel and explicitly distinguished from vulnerability classification. The GitLab example preserves checksum-locked wheel installation while eliminating independently drifting release literals. No credentials, private hosts, private repository details, environment contracts, Python support, or OCR compatibility decisions change.