2026 summer edits chpt12 - #449
Open
APEXCalculus wants to merge 3 commits into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is mostly just vertical figure adjustment, but there are a few other changes.
Definition 12.2.8 had 2 asides that accompanied it. I have merged these into one aside.
Within the Solution to Exercise 12.4.10, there was an aside that referred to a "flaw" in the definition of the unit normal vector
NwhereinT'could not be\vec 0; however, lines have this property! I moved the aside into text that follows Theorem 12.4.12 where it seems to fit better. I also changed the wording a little.