Skip to content
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
48 changes: 21 additions & 27 deletions ptx/sec_curvature.ptx
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@
We find it with <m>\vec r(2) = \la 1/5, 18/5\ra</m>.
</p>

<figure xml:id="fig_vvfarc1" vshift="-2">
<figure xml:id="fig_vvfarc1" vshift="0">
<caption>Graphing <m>\vec r</m> in <xref ref="ex_vvfarc1"/> with parameters <m>t</m> and <m>s</m></caption>
<!-- START figures/fig_vvfarc1.tex -->
<image width="47%">
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -687,7 +687,7 @@
Being able to think of curvature in terms of the radius of a circle is very useful.
</p>

<figure xml:id="fig_curvature_osculate" vshift="6">
<figure xml:id="fig_curvature_osculate" vshift="3">
<caption>Illustrating the osculating circles for the curve seen in <xref ref="fig_curvature_intro"/></caption>
<!-- START figures/fig_curvature_introc.tex -->
<image width="47%">
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -757,7 +757,7 @@
</md>.
</p>

<figure xml:id="fig_curvature3" vshift="0">
<figure xml:id="fig_curvature3" vshift="1">
<caption>Examining the curvature of <m>y=x^2</m></caption>
<!-- START figures/fig_curvature3.tex -->
<image width="47%">
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -834,26 +834,10 @@
</md>
</p>

<p>
While this is not a particularly <q>nice</q> formula,
it does explicitly tell us what the curvature is at a given <m>t</m> value.
To maximize <m>\kappa(t)</m>,
we should solve <m>\kappa'(t)=0</m> for <m>t</m>.
This is doable, but <em>very</em> time consuming.
Instead, consider the graph of
<m>\kappa(t)</m> as given in <xref ref="fig_curvature4a"/>.
We see that <m>\kappa</m> is maximized at two <m>t</m> values;
using a numerical solver, we find these values are <m>t\approx\pm 0.189</m>.
In <xref ref="fig_curvature4b_3D"/> we graph <m>\vrt</m> and indicate the points where curvature is maximized.
</p>

<figure xml:id="fig_curvature4">
<caption>Understanding the curvature of a curve in space</caption>
<sidebyside widths="47% 47%" margins="0%" valign="bottom">
<figure xml:id="fig_curvature4a">
<caption>The curvature of <m>\vec{r}(t)</m></caption>
<figure xml:id="fig_curvature4a" vshift="4">
<caption>The curvature of <m>\vec{r}(t)</m> in <xref ref="ex_curvature4"/></caption>
<!-- START figures/fig_curvature4a.tex -->

<!-- figures/figcurvature4_3D.asy END -->
</figure>
</sidebyside>

</figure>
<p>
While this is not a particularly <q>nice</q> formula,
it does explicitly tell us what the curvature is at a given <m>t</m> value.
To maximize <m>\kappa(t)</m>,
we should solve <m>\kappa'(t)=0</m> for <m>t</m>.
This is doable, but <em>very</em> time consuming.
Instead, consider the graph of
<m>\kappa(t)</m> as given in <xref ref="fig_curvature4a"/>.
We see that <m>\kappa</m> is maximized at two <m>t</m> values;
using a numerical solver, we find these values are <m>t\approx\pm 0.189</m>.
In <xref ref="fig_curvature4b_3D"/> we graph <m>\vrt</m> and indicate the points where curvature is maximized.
</p>

</solution>
</example>
Expand Down
44 changes: 20 additions & 24 deletions ptx/sec_tan_norm.ptx
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@
since they are only length 1.)
</p>

<figure xml:id="fig_tannorm1" vshift="-1">
<figure xml:id="fig_tannorm1" vshift="2">
<caption>Plotting unit tangent vectors in <xref ref="ex_tannorm1"/></caption>

<!-- START figures/figtannorm1_3D.asy -->
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -382,7 +382,7 @@
These are sketched in <xref ref="fig_tannorm3"/>.
</p>

<figure xml:id="fig_tannorm3" vshift="0">
<figure xml:id="fig_tannorm3" vshift="3">
<caption>Plotting unit tangent and normal vectors in <xref ref="ex_tannorm3"/></caption>

<!-- START figures/figtannorm3_3D.asy -->
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -447,17 +447,7 @@
</solution>
</example>

<aside vshift="-6">
<p>
There is one flaw in our definition of <m>\unitnormal(t)</m>:
it is possible that we could have <m>\unittangentprime(t)=0</m>!
Indeed, this is the case for any line of the form
<m>\vec{\ell}(t) = \vec{r}_0+t\vec{v}</m>.
For straight lines in the plane,
it is most common to orient the normal vector <m>90^\circ</m> counterclockwise from the tangent vector,
but for lines in three dimensions, there is no preferred choice of normal vector.
</p>
</aside>


<p>
The previous example was once again
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -517,7 +507,7 @@
we compute the unit tangent and normal vectors for <m>t=-1,0</m> and 1 and sketch them in <xref ref="fig_tannorm4"/>.
</p>

<figure xml:id="fig_tannorm4" vshift="-5">
<figure xml:id="fig_tannorm4" vshift="0">
<caption>Plotting unit tangent and normal vectors in <xref ref="ex_tannorm4"/></caption>
<!-- START figures/fig_tannorm4.tex -->
<image width="47%">
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -607,6 +597,18 @@
</p>
</statement>
</theorem>

<p>
A brief consideration of this theorem may make one wonder: what if the graph of <m>\vec r</m> does
not have a concave side? What if <m>\vec r</m> is a line?
</p>
<p>
This exposes a shortcoming in our definition of <m>\unitnormal(t)</m>, where
we require that <m>\unittangent(t)</m> be smooth, i.e., that <m>\unittangentprime(t) \neq \vec 0</m>,
a requirement that lines do not fulfill. One may still want to compute a normal vector for a given line, though.
For straight lines in the <m>x,y</m> plane, it is most common to orient the normal vector <m>90^\circ</m>
counterclockwise from the tangent vector. For lines in three dimensions, there is no preferred choice of normal vector.
</p>
</subsection>

<subsection>
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -802,7 +804,7 @@
gives a graph of the path for reference.
</p>

<figure xml:id="fig_tannorm6" vshift="0">
<figure xml:id="fig_tannorm6" vshift="2">
<caption>Graphing <m>\vec r(t)</m> in <xref ref="ex_tannorm6"/></caption>
<!-- START figures/fig_tannorm6.tex -->
<image width="47%">
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -875,7 +877,7 @@
which we plot in <xref ref="fig_tannorm7b"/>.
</p>

<figure xml:id="fig_tannorm7b" vshift="-2">
<figure xml:id="fig_tannorm7b" vshift="0">
<caption>Plotting the position of a thrown ball, with 1s increments shown</caption>
<!-- START figures/fig_tannorm7b.tex -->
<image width="47%">
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1043,10 +1045,7 @@
<statement>
<p>
If <m>\unittangent(t)</m> is a unit tangent vector,
what is <m>\norm{\unittangent(t)}</m>?
</p>

<p>
what is <m>\norm{\unittangent(t)}</m>?
<fillin answer="1" width="5"/>
</p>
</statement>
Expand All @@ -1072,10 +1071,7 @@
<statement>
<p>
If <m>\unitnormal(t)</m> is a unit normal vector,
what is <m>\unitnormal(t)\cdot \vrp(t)</m>?
</p>

<p>
what is <m>\unitnormal(t)\cdot \vrp(t)</m>?
<fillin answer="0" width="5"/>
</p>
</statement>
Expand Down
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions ptx/sec_vvf.ptx
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -648,7 +648,7 @@
<m>\vec r(t) = \vec p(t) + \vec c(t) = \la \cos(t) + t,-\sin(t) +1\ra</m>,
which is graphed in <xref ref="fig_vvf4b"/>.
</p>
<figure xml:id="fig_vvf4b" vshift="2">
<figure xml:id="fig_vvf4b" vshift="3">
<caption>The cycloid in <xref ref="ex_vvf4"/></caption>
<!-- START figures/fig_vvf4a.tex -->
<image width="47%">
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -750,7 +750,7 @@
The displacement of <m>\vec r(t)</m> on <m>[-1,1]</m> is thus <m>\vec d = \la 0,1\ra - \la 0,-1\ra = \la 0,2\ra</m>.
</p>

<figure xml:id="fig_vvf5" vshift="-6">
<figure xml:id="fig_vvf5" vshift="2">
<caption>Graphing the displacement of a position function in <xref ref="ex_vvf5"/></caption>
<!-- START figures/fig_vvf5.tex -->
<image width="47%">
Expand Down
29 changes: 15 additions & 14 deletions ptx/sec_vvf_calc.ptx
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
The theorem following the definition shows that in practice,
taking limits of vector-valued functions is no more difficult than taking limits of real-valued functions.
</p>
<aside vshift="0">
<aside vshift="-2">
<p>
We can define one-sided limits in a manner very similar to <xref ref="def_vvf_limit"/>.
</p>
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -339,13 +339,21 @@
</statement>
</definition>

<aside vshift="0">
<aside vshift="3">
<p>
Alternate notations for the derivative of <m>\vec r</m> include:
Two notes on <xref ref="def_vvf_derivative"/>:
</p>
<p>
First, alternate notations for the derivative of <m>\vec r</m> include:
<md>
\vrp(t) = \frac{d}{dt}\big(\,\vec r(t)\,\big) = \frac{d\vec r}{dt}
</md>.
</p>
<p>
Second, using one-sided limits,
we can define differentiability on closed intervals.
We'll make use of this a few times in this chapter.
</p>
</aside>
<p>
If a vector-valued function has a derivative for all <m>c</m> in an open interval <m>I</m>,
Expand All @@ -359,14 +367,7 @@
The following theorem verifies that this means we can compute derivatives component-wise as well,
making the task not too difficult.
</p>
<aside vshift="0">
<p>
Again, using one-sided limits,
we can define differentiability on closed intervals.
We'll make use of this a few times in this chapter.
</p>
</aside>


<theorem xml:id="thm_vvf_deriv">
<title>Derivatives of Vector-Valued Functions</title>
<statement>
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -992,7 +993,7 @@
<m>\vec u(t)</m> is 1 for all <m>t</m>.
</p>

<figure xml:id="fig_vvfderiv2a" vshift="-3">
<figure xml:id="fig_vvfderiv2a" vshift="0">
<caption>Graphing <m>\vec r(t)</m> and <m>\vec u(t)</m> in <xref ref="ex_vvfderiv2"/></caption>
<!-- START figures/fig_vvfderiv2a.tex -->
<image width="47%">
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1070,7 +1071,7 @@
</md>
</p>

<figure xml:id="fig_vvfderiv2b" vshift="-5">
<figure xml:id="fig_vvfderiv2b" vshift="2">
<caption>Graphing some of the derivatives of <m>\vec u(t)</m> in <xref ref="ex_vvfderiv2"/></caption>
<!-- START figures/fig_vvfderiv2b.tex -->
<image width="47%">
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -2312,7 +2313,7 @@

<statement>
<p>
<m>\displaystyle\int_0^{\pi} \la -\sin(t) ,\cos(t) \ra\,dt=</m><var name="$int" width="30"/>.
<m>\displaystyle\int_0^{\pi} \la -\sin(t) ,\cos(t) \ra\,dt=</m><var name="$int" width="20"/>.
</p>
</statement>
</webwork>
Expand Down
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions ptx/sec_vvf_motion.ptx
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -863,6 +863,8 @@
</md>.
</p>

<p xml:id="pagebreak-projectile-motion"></p>

<insight xml:id="idea_projectile">
<title>Projectile Motion</title>
<p>
Expand Down
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions publication/publication-pdf.ptx
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@
<insertions pagebreaks="exset-double-polar-special exset-cylindrical-spherical-setup exset-Greens-divergence exset-vectors-balance-forces"/>
<!-- other page breaks -->
<insertions pagebreaks="pagebreak-taylor-series pagebreak-iterated-int pagebreak-glossary"/>
<insertions pagebreaks="pagebreak-projectile-motion"/>
</latex>
<epub>
<cover front="cover/cover.png"/>
Expand Down