feat(vtk-wasm)!: update to v2 which require vtk>=9.6

[jourdain]

This is a breaking change as some API have changed, but the main usage of the widget should remain mostly unchanged.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 70.58%. Comparing base (c357ac5) to head (7989ec1).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #72   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   70.58%   70.58%           
=======================================
  Files           2        2           
  Lines          17       17           
=======================================
  Hits           12       12           
  Misses          5        5           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[jourdain]

Bugs and issues to fix before merging:

• interactive update don't update the 3D scene (cone resolution)
• Update dispose methods to properly clear the component when still alive
• What should we do if we were to support dynamic RenderWindow ID as property?
• Validate onMounted and onBeforeUnMount
• Make sure the validation example works fully

@jspanchu let's discuss that when you are back online.
FYI @ansbbrooks => The update(options) trigger an updated event with the options as the $event content which could allow client methods to execute custom code based on it.

[jspanchu]

interactive update don't update the 3D scene (cone resolution)

Kitware/vtk-wasm#51

What should we do if we were to support dynamic RenderWindow ID as property?

should the old render window and it's canvas be hidden? or cleaned up?

Validate onMounted and onBeforeUnMount
Make sure the validation example works fully

Can we write automated tests for these two?

[jourdain]

@jspanchu should we merge it?