Skip to content

docs(agents): make the pull-request review rule neutral about who reviews #453

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
ScriptedAlchemy merged 1 commit into from
Sep 3, 2026
Merged

docs(agents): make the pull-request review rule neutral about who reviews #453

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
8 changes: 3 additions & 5 deletions AGENTS.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -72,11 +72,9 @@
the PR description under a "Self-review" section (reviewer model, findings,
disposition), run the reviewer once more after fixes, then merge on green
CI.
- Never solicit external reviews: no `@codex review` comments, no waiting for
the connector, no unreviewed-SHA bookkeeping. Review comments that arrive
on their own (Codex or human) are still addressed — fix in the same PR or
reply with a precise reason — and re-checked after each push until none
remain.
- CI green first. Address every review thread, whoever opened it — fix it in
the same PR or reply with a precise reason — and re-check for new threads
after each push until none remain. Only then merge.
- PRs are squash-merged. Review threads left on an already-merged PR must
still be answered, in a follow-up PR.

Expand Down
Loading