Move support to OTP 22+

[paulo-ferraz-oliveira]

Closes #103.

This pull request is being split into several other pull requests, to ease review. These are listed below.

• Update code for the new OTP 22-25 maintenance range #119
• Tweak rebar.config (update deps then fixed issue warnings) #120
• Increase confidence in Dialyzer and Xref results #122

[paulo-ferraz-oliveira]

Work in blacklist mode (accept all defaults except...), and add test to the mix.

[paulo-ferraz-oliveira]

I don't see where catch was actually used, since all the clauses derive not from exceptions, but simple function returns.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 82.35% and project coverage change: +0.07% 🎉

Comparison is base (3ec3522) 76.32% compared to head (829beda) 76.40%.

❗ Your organization is not using the GitHub App Integration. As a result you may experience degraded service beginning May 15th. Please install the Github App Integration for your organization. Read more.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #114      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   76.32%   76.40%   +0.07%     
==========================================
  Files          12       12              
  Lines         756      750       -6     
==========================================
- Hits          577      573       -4     
+ Misses        179      177       -2     

Files Changed	Coverage Δ
src/elli_middleware.erl	100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/elli_sendfile.erl	62.50% <ø> (ø)
src/elli_tcp.erl	86.66% <ø> (ø)
src/elli_util.erl	100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/elli_request.erl	78.49% <50.00%> (ø)
src/elli_http.erl	68.13% <80.00%> (+0.02%)	⬆️
src/elli.erl	77.61% <100.00%> (ø)
src/elli_example_callback.erl	90.62% <100.00%> (ø)

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[paulo-ferraz-oliveira]

CI failing for OTP 26, 24, and 22. I'll try to replicate locally.

[paulo-ferraz-oliveira]

It's possible the failure for non-OTP 26 is due to #99, since re-executing the tests (in a fork) showed ✅.

[paulo-ferraz-oliveira]

Removed OTP 26 from scope, since there're SSL -related issues to solve. Should be moved to a new PR, I guess...

[tsloughter]

Woo, these are all looking good.

And yea, for 26 the ssl certs may need to be re-created. I had to do this for chatterbox tests too.

[paulo-ferraz-oliveira]

Is anything lacking for this one to get merged? I can then rebase and update the other ones.

I think I'll deal with OTP 26 in a separate PR so as to not inflict further confusion in these pull requests... 😄

[paulo-ferraz-oliveira]

@tsloughter, if you prefer I can also reduce the scope for this and do multiple pull requests to an isolated branch until you're fully satisfied and then we merge to the main branch.

[tsloughter]

This doesn't look too bad, I just hadn't taken a close look.

[paulo-ferraz-oliveira]

@tsloughter, what's required to push this forward?

[tsloughter]

Hey sorry, it is just a large PR. But it looks like a lot of it is formatting?

[paulo-ferraz-oliveira]

👋 it's probably the commit related to Elvis, but I can try to break it down further.

[paulo-ferraz-oliveira]

I'm moving to draft, to be able to break it down into several pull requests. Once that's done, I'll close this one without it being merged.

[paulo-ferraz-oliveira]

All new pull requests mentioned in the top description.