GH-560: Add encoding='utf-8' to fix "UnicodeDecodeError" (Sourcery refactored)

[sourcery-ai]

Pull Request #2 refactored by Sourcery.

Since the original Pull Request was opened as a fork in a contributor's
repository, we are unable to create a Pull Request branching from it.

To incorporate these changes, you can either:

1. Merge this Pull Request instead of the original, or

2. Ask your contributor to locally incorporate these commits and push them to
   the original Pull Request

   Incorporate changes via command line

   git fetch https://github.com/hungpham3112/underthesea pull/2/head
   git merge --ff-only FETCH_HEAD
   git push

NOTE: As code is pushed to the original Pull Request, Sourcery will
re-run and update (force-push) this Pull Request with new refactorings as
necessary. If Sourcery finds no refactorings at any point, this Pull Request
will be closed automatically.

See our documentation here.

Run Sourcery locally

Reduce the feedback loop during development by using the Sourcery editor plugin:

• VS Code
• PyCharm

Help us improve this pull request!

[sourcery-ai]

Function LabelEncoder.encode refactored with the following changes:

• Swap if/else branches (swap-if-else-branches)
• Remove unnecessary else after guard condition (remove-unnecessary-else)

[sourcery-ai]

Function UITABSAHotel.__init__ refactored with the following changes:

• Replace interpolated string formatting with f-string (replace-interpolation-with-fstring)

[sourcery-ai]

Function LabelEncoder.encode refactored with the following changes:

• Swap if/else branches (swap-if-else-branches)
• Remove unnecessary else after guard condition (remove-unnecessary-else)

[sourcery-ai]

Function UITABSARestaurant.__init__ refactored with the following changes:

• Replace interpolated string formatting with f-string (replace-interpolation-with-fstring)

[sourcery-ai]

Sourcery Code Quality Report

Merging this PR leaves code quality unchanged.

Quality metrics	Before	After	Change
Complexity	0.84 ⭐	0.84 ⭐	0.00
Method Length	47.50 ⭐	47.50 ⭐	0.00
Working memory	5.96 ⭐	5.96 ⭐	0.00
Quality	82.85% ⭐	82.85% ⭐	0.00%

Other metrics	Before	After	Change
Lines	138	138	0

Changed files	Quality Before	Quality After	Quality Change
underthesea/datasets/uit_absa_hotel/uit_absa_hotel.py	82.85% ⭐	82.85% ⭐	0.00%
underthesea/datasets/uit_absa_restaurant/uit_absa_restaurant.py	82.85% ⭐	82.85% ⭐	0.00%

Here are some functions in these files that still need a tune-up:

File	Function	Complexity	Length	Working Memory	Quality	Recommendation
underthesea/datasets/uit_absa_hotel/uit_absa_hotel.py	UITABSAHotel._extract_sentence	2 ⭐	83 🙂	10 😞	69.42% 🙂	Extract out complex expressions
underthesea/datasets/uit_absa_restaurant/uit_absa_restaurant.py	UITABSARestaurant._extract_sentence	2 ⭐	83 🙂	10 😞	69.42% 🙂	Extract out complex expressions

Legend and Explanation

The emojis denote the absolute quality of the code:

• ⭐ excellent
• 🙂 good
• 😞 poor
• ⛔ very poor

The 👍 and 👎 indicate whether the quality has improved or gotten worse with this pull request.

---

Please see our documentation here for details on how these metrics are calculated.

We are actively working on this report - lots more documentation and extra metrics to come!

Help us improve this quality report!