pm-dispatch references: the seat record reads the head's check-runs as gate evidence; ACCEPT is the PR's seat record; two pre-landing checks

[objectstack-fleet]

Fixes #23409
Clause-②: no

The card's two items plus the three added in comment 6163735021, inside triage's scope (comment 6163828327): text only, all under .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/**; no SKILL.md, no scripts/**, no new gate. Dispatched by the domain:skills seat 1 under the claim in comment 6164024645 (branch claude/issue-23409-seat-record-reads-check-runs, session session_013zGKMG1cRedVzWtqGGGZW9). Base: origin/main at 04a314873c, with PR #23389 and PR #23422 both on main.

Authority: the remainder of #23378's 方案 4 under the maintainer's 「同意」, verbatim: 「dev 本地验证瘦身,CI 是证据。本地只跑改动包的 typecheck 和测试、以及读到改动文件的门禁族;全量门禁族交给 PR 的 CI check-runs,ACCEPT 读 check-runs(复审员已经这么做)。」 This PR carries its change 4, the seat half; the dev half is already on main from PR #23405.

维护者速读(草稿)

改了什么:PM 派发协议的三份参考文件,各改一行,纯文本:
① 复核清单写明「席位核对」的门禁证据就是 PR 当前 head 上的 CI check-runs(名称+结论),dev 在本地跑的门禁只证明本地那一小部分,不能顶替缺席的 check-run;
② ACCEPT 判决的落点从「卡上一条英文短评论」改为「PR 上的 ## 席位核对 评论,卡上只留一行指针」,对所有 PR 一律适用;
③ 落地细则里「落地前检三条」改为「两条」,与契约复核细则的枚举对齐。

为什么改:落实您对「CI 是证据、ACCEPT 读 check-runs」的同意——dev 一侧已落地,本卡补上席位一侧;另两处是今天两份协议 PR 落地后遗留的文本不一致,不改会让席位按两种说法各行其是。

风险与代价(含回滚):无代码、无脚本、无新门禁;三个文件行数均不增(77/183/101 持平)。复核清单为腾出一行,删去了「复核后又推提交须补跑并集」一句——dev 契约自带同一句,上一行也已判过时的本地并集不作数,所以不丢规则。回滚 = revert 本 PR。

席位意见:

你要做的:无需操作——.claude/** 属 Tier S,由席位契约复审档复核 PASS 后入队;若反对「ACCEPT 一律落在 PR 上」,在 #23409 线程留一句否决即可。

Rule sentences, before → after

1. references/review-checklist.md 〈测试与门禁证据〉: the seat record's gate evidence (77 → 77 lines)

before: (none)
after:  - 席位核对门禁证据 = 钉 head 的 check-runs(名+结论);本地并集只证本地子集,⛔ 不替缺席者。

New line 49, 118 bytes. It sits after the two head-pin lines for check-runs (:47 pins every gate reading to head.sha, :48 the non-head cancelled), so 「钉 head」 is that pin, and before the local union's own head pin (:49 → :50, unchanged).

Paid by a same-file deletion:

before: - 复核后又推提交而 HEAD 未动 ⇒ 补跑并集(至少棘轮族)再更新报告。
after:  (deleted; was line 50)

Why it restates: its remedy is the dev contract's own unconditional duty, .claude/agents/os-dev.md:161–162 「复核后任何一次 push,都在新 head 上重跑并集。」 「至少重跑 ratchet 族,然后才更新报告或 PR 正文。」; and its seat-side verdict is the line kept just above it, 「dev 本地并集钉 head:所抄 git rev-parse --short HEAD 不符 PR head.sha 或没抄 ⇒ 双向都不入账。」 A union whose cited HEAD did not move after a later push is exactly that case. Under the new line the seat's gate evidence after such a push is the new head's check-runs, never a re-run union.

The dispatch's mechanism note (one amended line may be enough) was measured and does not hold: :44 is 112 bytes and :45 119; the full rule folded into :44 measures 140 bytes, over the 120-byte cap. :44's 「⛔ 不因报告写了本地绿跳过」 stays: it governs the act of reading the two required jobs, the new line governs what counts as evidence. The dispatch's suggested spelling (147 bytes) was shortened to fit.

2. references/execution-duties.md:179: the ACCEPT verdict's location (183 → 183, in place)

before: - 判决 ACCEPT:issue 英文短评论,核对清单结论 + 抽查读数 + 偏差,链接 PR,⛔ 不复述其叙事。
after:  - 判决 ACCEPT:PR 评论 `## 席位核对`,清单结论+抽查读数+偏差,⛔ 不复述其叙事;卡留指针行。

116 → 118 bytes. This is the seat's ruling A in comment 6163735021 (every PR, governed or not). Its veto window was read at this head: the comments after it on #23409 are the unblock (6163808287), triage (6163828327) and the claim (6164024645); none overrules. The dispatch's suggested spelling measures 137 bytes, not 118, because each CJK character is 3 bytes, so it was shortened. 「核对」 is dropped because 清单 is this section's 复核清单. 「英文」 is dropped because SKILL.md:95 already makes every new GitHub text English. 「链接 PR」 is dropped because the record now sits on the PR. The pointer's spelling stays single-sourced at SKILL.md:190. Consistent with the one machine reader of the verdict: check-half-states.mjs H48 already reads it as an issue comment on the PR.

3. Pre-landing check count: two. references/landing-operations.md:59 corrected in place (101 → 101)

before: - 受管路径全在 `.claude/**` 者 Tier S:席内达档复核过落地前检三条即转正式入队。
after:  - 受管路径全在 `.claude/**` 者 Tier S:席内达档复核过落地前检两条即转正式入队。

Evidence that two is the true count:

• The list is defined once, at references/contract-review.md:32–36. That is PR tooling(pm): the contract review's tier follows the face that made it owed #23389's landed text; lines 32, 35 and 36 are untouched by it. 「落地前检两条,过则 Tier S 入队、Tier H 等人批:① 达档条款②复核 PASS 在案(同形记录)。」 … 「② PR check 全绿,⛔ 非 required 子集;…」. references/lanes/director.md:35 points into it by number: 「受管面两层落地见 ../contract-review.md 落地前检②」.
• AGENTS.md Prime Directive feat: Comprehensive CRM example demonstrating all ObjectStack protocol features #14 names the same two for Tier S: a ## Contract review record for the current head with Served-tier: CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER and a PASS verdict, "and every check is green". check-governed-merges.mjs --branch on this branch prints the same two (record + "every check green").
• History. The shared clone was deepened to read it (--deepen=600, then --deepen=1500). c2cce8fd1b (2026-09-14, PR docs(pm): landing-operations names the two landing tiers and lanes/ui.md's spec pointer states the landed rule (#18037) #18111) wrote the 「三条」 sentence while contract-review.md's list had three items: ① PASS 在案, ② 双载体已清 (check-clause2-carriers.mjs --pair N), ③ PR check 全绿. 7e0bfce400 (2026-09-22, PR pm(skills): retire the clause-② gate text — label hang/clear, --pair, double carrier, independence requirement (step ②) #19694) retired the double-carrier item and renumbered the list to 「两条」. Its PR body named the director.md pointer drift (③ → ②) but not landing-operations.md:59, which has said 「三条」 since.
• No third check is named anywhere. Grep 落地前检 over .claude/, AGENTS.md and scripts/pm/*.mjs: contract-review.md:32 (两条), landing-operations.md:59 (三条), lanes/director.md:35 (②), SKILL.md:197 (no count), plus script prose that quotes SKILL.md:197.
• The dispatch's three readings were checked and not adopted. The third one, check-governed-merges.mjs --pr N answering Tier S, is the tier classifier. It already has its own bullet one line above, landing-operations.md:58 「转 ready/入队前跑 check-governed-merges.mjs --pr N:受管面照两层;…」. contract-review.md:32 uses it to choose the branch (「过则 Tier S 入队、Tier H 等人批」), not as a third condition to pass. Listing it inside contract-review.md would restate :58. "Roster-skipped" is item ②'s own exception (SKILL.md:205 「每 check 绿或预期 skip」), not a separate check. dispatch-gates.mjs calls the --pr read "the landing pre-check" in English prose. That names a pre-landing step, not an item of this list.

4. Under-tier route: read, nothing written

references/execution-duties.md:112 「自审随面定档:仅申报面车道席作 TIER_DEFAULT 记录;余面未达档 ⛔ 不自审,起隔离子代理。」 and references/cross-repo-coordination.md:45 「认领即跟到 MERGED:派发后发现跨车道面(含 spec)不移卡,复核按面定档,未达档借隔离复核。」 were both rewritten by PR #23389 (4f81f31526). Their earlier spellings were 「未达档 ⛔ 不自审,起隔离达档子代理」 and 「认领席借契约复审档隔离复核」. Reading: they agree. The tier follows the face, and a seat below the face's tier does not review its own work: it takes an isolated review at that tier. No reconciliation is owed, so cross-repo-coordination.md is untouched (51/51).

SKILL.md:190, read against them and not edited (triage excludes SKILL.md): 「指针 ACCEPT → PR #n comment ID;技能面 hunk 须由契约复审档的席复核,档外席先交 skills 席。」 The pointer's placeholder is respelled as ID for the body sanitizer.

• Still true as a tier and lane-ownership rule. A skills-face hunk is governed rules text, so it is reviewed at CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER (contract-review.md:11), and the governed surfaces are domain:skills' lane (SKILL.md 域车道 table).
• Stale as a route. 「档外席先交 skills 席」 names a second under-tier route, handing the hunk to the skills seat, beside the references' single one, an isolated review at the face's tier.

Acceptance notes

• The scripts' remedy prose still names the old terminal ("ACCEPT on the card, needs-user-decision on the PR, a final 维护者速读 …"). Triage excludes these files, so they are not edited: scripts/pm/check-governed-merges.mjs:220 and :1865, and scripts/pm/check-governed-queue-guard.mjs:384 and :1993. A fifth site the dispatch did not list carries the same phrase: scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs:11928 (the size-limb remedy). All five are prose; no reading depends on them. carrier: none — tooling card if the maintainer wants the prose moved.
• The SKILL.md:190 route reading above: two routes for an under-tier review of a skills-face hunk. carrier: none (a SKILL.md card, if the seat wants one route).

Verification, at head 229a926376

The local subset is the families node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack derives for this diff. Each exit code was captured before any pipe:

node scripts/check-closing-keyword-parity.mjs :: exit 0
node scripts/check-closing-keyword-parity.mjs --self-test :: exit 0
node scripts/check-comment-mask-corpus.mjs :: exit 0
node scripts/pm/check-harness-current.mjs --self-test :: exit 0
pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint run check:doc-formula-expressions :: exit 0   (first run exit 3 PREREQUISITE NOT MET; prerequisite built under os-verify-lock, VERDICT command-exit 0, then re-run)
pnpm check:agent-test-spelling :: exit 0
pnpm check:cross-package-test-inputs :: exit 0
pnpm check:doc-authoring :: exit 0
pnpm check:driver-memory-census :: exit 0
pnpm check:gitlink-declared :: exit 0
pnpm check:nul-bytes :: exit 0
pnpm check:pm-governed-merges :: exit 0
pnpm check:pm-skill-id-lint :: exit 0   (87 file(s) clean)
pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet :: exit 0   (review-checklist.md 77/77, landing-operations.md 101/101, execution-duties.md 183/183)
pnpm check:refd-timer-probe :: exit 0
pnpm check:required-contexts :: exit 0
pnpm check:skill-frame-sync :: exit 0
pnpm check:watch-hint-literal :: exit 0
pnpm check:pm-governed-prose :: exit 0   (artifact roster, run because the card names it)
pnpm check:pm-settings-deny-roster :: exit 0   (artifact roster whose roster sits under .claude)

--ran reconciliation: 「Run reconciliation — 18 derived, 18 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED, 0 UNRUN.」 and 「a DERIVED zero — all 18 recorded an exit code and none of them is 3」.

Every line of the three files is 120 bytes or less (widest: 119, 120, 120). The added lines carry no full-width punctuation, and there are no control bytes. There is no ablation, because the change is text only. CI's families are read off this PR's check-runs and are not re-run locally. The tier reading from check-governed-merges.mjs --branch is GOVERNED, Tier S, .claude/** ×3, size 6 ≤ 3000; the landing tier is read at landing by --pr. skip-changeset: .claude/** ships in no package.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[objectstack-fleet]

Contract review

Served-tier: CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER
Head-sha: 229a9263768191ac775e3c9af889bb260602b5cd
Local-runs: none

Reviewed in seat by the dispatching skills seat (served tier read from get_session last_served_model this fire, equal to the constant's value), on the PR diff (three files, +3/−3, one commit on 04a314873c; check-governed-merges --pr 23439: .claude/** ×3, Tier S, 6 changed lines), card #23409 (the remainder of #23378's 方案 4 under the maintainer's 「同意」; the three added items 6163735021; triage's scope 6163828327), the dev's report (the newest os-dev-report comment on the card) and the head's check-runs. The governed faces are the review checklist, the execution duties and the landing window; the judgment is whether each sentence says what its authority says and whether the one deletion is still said elsewhere. Written 2026-10-14T08:43Z.

① Derived judgments

• review-checklist.md 〈测试与门禁证据〉, new line 「席位核对门禁证据 = 钉 head 的 check-runs(名+结论);本地并集只证本地子集,⛔ 不替缺席者。」 (118 bytes) — the card's body item and os-dev verification: local = the changed packages' typecheck and tests plus the gate families reading changed files; the derived sweep is CI's, read from check-runs; ablations only where a tested behaviour changes (方案 4, 「同意」 2026-10-14) #23378's change 4 (the dispatching seat's record reads the PR's check-runs as the gate evidence, not the dev's local sweep), placed beside the head-pin rule it relies on (L47) and the dev-union pin (L49). Correct; this is the seat half of the rule PR docs(os-dev, AGENTS, pm-dispatch): local verification = changed packages typecheck/tests + families reading changed files; main merged after PR open only on conflict, main-red or queue removal #23405 wrote for the dev. Paid by deleting old L50 「复核后又推提交而 HEAD 未动 ⇒ 补跑并集(至少棘轮族)再更新报告。」 — the dev's own duty at os-dev.md:161–162 (「复核后任何一次 push,都在新 head 上重跑并集」「至少重跑 ratchet 族,然后才更新报告或 PR 正文」), and the seat side is L49 (a union whose cited sha does not match the head is not counted). A restatement; nothing a seat still owes leaves the checklist. The dispatch's note that L44/L45 could be amended in place measured false (140 bytes); the deletion is the right payment.
• execution-duties.md:179 in place: 「判决 ACCEPT:PR 评论 ## 席位核对,清单结论+抽查读数+偏差,⛔ 不复述其叙事;卡留指针行。」 (118 bytes) — the seat's ruling A on 6163735021 (no overrule on the thread), the card's item 1: every PR's ACCEPT is the ## 席位核对 comment on the PR with a pointer line on the card, as SKILL.md L188–191 (PR pm-dispatch: one seat record per governed PR; the card keeps a pointer; the landing comment is the probe table; the director ledger is one block per summon #23422) now says for governed PRs. Correct; the dispatch's suggested spelling measured 137 bytes and was rightly shortened.
• landing-operations.md:59 in place: 「落地前检三条」 → 「落地前检两条」. The count's single definition is contract-review.md:32–36 (PR tooling(pm): the contract review's tier follows the face that made it owed #23389's landed text): ① 达档条款②复核 PASS 在案, ② PR check 全绿 (roster skips being ②'s own exception); lanes/director.md:35 points at 落地前检②; history (the dev deepened the clone to read it) shows c2cce8fd1b wrote 「三条」 when the list had three items and 7e0bfce400 retired the --pair item and renumbered without touching this line. The seat's own third reading — check-governed-merges --pr answering Tier S — is the tier classifier (landing-operations.md:58, the bullet above), not a condition. Correct: two.
• Under-tier route, read and not written: execution-duties.md:112 (起隔离子代理) and cross-repo-coordination.md:45 (未达档借隔离复核), both PR tooling(pm): the contract review's tier follows the face that made it owed #23389's text, agree — the tier follows the face and a seat below it takes an isolated review at that tier. SKILL.md:190 「技能面 hunk 须由契约复审档的席复核,档外席先交 skills 席」 names a second route (hand the hunk to the skills seat); triage excluded SKILL.md from this card, so the drift is reported, not edited. The seat files the card (below).
• Ratchet on the head: review-checklist.md 77/77, execution-duties.md 183/183, landing-operations.md 101/101; widest changed lines 119/120/120 bytes; Lint & Repo Gates (ratchet, id lint, governed-prose scan) success. Fixes #23409 is the body's only closing keyword (docs(pm): landing-operations names the two landing tiers and lanes/ui.md's spec pointer states the landed rule (#18037) #18111, pm(skills): retire the clause-② gate text — label hang/clear, --pair, double carrier, independence requirement (step ②) #19694, os-dev verification: local = the changed packages' typecheck and tests plus the gate families reading changed files; the derived sweep is CI's, read from check-runs; ablations only where a tested behaviour changes (方案 4, 「同意」 2026-10-14) #23378, tooling(pm): the contract review's tier follows the face that made it owed #23389, docs(os-dev, AGENTS, pm-dispatch): local verification = changed packages typecheck/tests + families reading changed files; main merged after PR open only on conflict, main-red or queue removal #23405, pm-dispatch: one seat record per governed PR; the card keeps a pointer; the landing comment is the probe table; the director ledger is one block per summon #23422 carry no closing verb); Clause-②: no is correct — internal protocol text, no published surface; no SKILL.md, no scripts/** in the diff, as triage scoped.

② Semver level

None owed: .claude/** ships in no package; skip-changeset on the PR is correct.

③ Boundary flags

• Dev flag — the shared clone's history was deepened (git fetch --deepen, 196 → 2932 commits on the ancestry) to read the 三条/两条 history; additive to .git/shallow, no working-tree edit. Accepted; the reading it bought is what settled item 3.
• Dev flag — one prerequisite two-package build under the verify lock for check:doc-formula-expressions; 18 derived families run, --ran 18/18; two roster gates beyond the derivation (check:pm-governed-prose, check:pm-settings-deny-roster) exit 0. Accepted.
• Carried by the seat as a card (filed this fire, see the pointer on the card): SKILL.md:190's second under-tier route vs the references' one route (decision: which model serves the clause-② contract review — fable on every lane (ruling 5771798588), or fable only for the spec / skills lanes and governed surfaces with opus elsewhere? #23352 ruling B′ with C) — SKILL.md 〈优先级〉 says two conflicting rules ⇒ act on the stricter and file a card.
• Observation (dev, no card): the scripts' remedy prose still names the old terminal ("ACCEPT on the card, needs-user-decision on the PR, a final 维护者速读") at check-governed-merges.mjs:220/:1865, check-governed-queue-guard.mjs:384/:1993, dispatch-gates.mjs:11928 — prose only, no reading depends on it; a tooling card only if the maintainer wants the prose moved (dispatch-gates.mjs is frozen by instrument-discipline.md:10).
• open_questions: none.

Implemented-by: claude/issue-23409-seat-record-reads-check-runs
Reviewed-by: session_013zGKMG1cRedVzWtqGGGZW9

VERDICT: PASS

---

Generated by Claude Code

[objectstack-fleet]

席位核对 · PR #23439 at 229a926376 (Fixes #23409) — Tier S, landing by the seat

Skills seat 1 (session_013zGKMG1cRedVzWtqGGGZW9, huangyiirene), written 2026-10-14T08:43Z. Report read; everything below is verified on GitHub and the tree, not on the report.

1. 形态: draft PR against main; line 1 Fixes #23409 is the body's only closing keyword; Clause-②: no at line start; three files, +3/−3, one commit on 04a314873c; skip-changeset (nothing published); check-governed-merges --pr 23439 → .claude/** ×3, Tier S, 6 changed lines; assignee huangyiirene; no SKILL.md, no scripts/** (triage's scope).
2. 前提实测: the seat-record rule is on main since PR pm-dispatch: one seat record per governed PR; the card keeps a pointer; the landing comment is the probe table; the director ledger is one block per summon #23422 (SKILL.md L188–191) and the dev half since PR docs(os-dev, AGENTS, pm-dispatch): local verification = changed packages typecheck/tests + families reading changed files; main merged after PR open only on conflict, main-red or queue removal #23405 (os-dev.md ③/④); the pre-landing count's one definition is contract-review.md:32–36 with two items, the history of the stale 「三条」 read from c2cce8fd1b → 7e0bfce400; the two references on the under-tier route agree. Judged line by line in the ## Contract review PASS record above for this head.
3. 门禁 check-runs: 38 runs on 229a926376, read 2026-10-14T08:41Z — by newest run per name 23 success, 11 skipped, none failing or in progress; Lint & Repo Gates and TypeScript Type Check success; every skipped name is on the expected-skips roster (scripts/pm/check-expected-skips.mjs, read from source on main). The dev's local subset (18 derived families, exit 0, --ran 18/18) is its own evidence; the farm's is these check-runs — which is the very sentence this PR writes into the checklist.
4. 接受的偏差: the dispatch's spellings over the 120-byte cap (shortened by the dev); the deletion of old L50 instead of an in-place amendment (L44/L45 measured 140 bytes folded); the shared clone's history deepened for the count reading; one prerequisite build under the verify lock.
5. 范围外去向: SKILL.md:190's second under-tier route → a card filed by the seat this fire (the pointer comment on pm-dispatch references, after PR #23389 lands: the ACCEPT reads the PR's check-runs as its gate evidence (review-checklist.md), and the pre-landing check count agrees between landing-operations.md:59 and contract-review.md:29 #23409 names it); the five scripts' remedy-prose sites → observation for the maintainer (tooling, prose only, dispatch-gates.mjs frozen) — no card unless asked.
6. 落地条款: Tier S — PASS record on this head, every check green, roster-expected skips ⇒ the seat flips pr_ready, reads mergeable_state until it settles, then arms automerge_enable as a second relay stroke; MERGED is confirmed from the queue ref and origin/main, then pm:dispatched leaves the card with a probe-table landing comment.

---

Generated by Claude Code