docs(adr): 0001 — the PM quality flywheel (design only)#39
Merged
Conversation
Cross-team learning from the data the delivery-loop gates now produce (review findings per ADR 0077, bounce counters, ladder telemetry, design-gate rejections): a bounded per-board quality block in the rollup (D1, board-side aggregation — PM context must not scale with findings volume), a scheduled portfolio_retro pass diffing across boards (D2: dispatch policy / process advice / lessons), humans as the actuator for cross-boundary config (D3), no new store (D4). Implementation deliberately deferred until live review_gate data exists to validate the aggregate shapes against. Plan M8 (protoAgent docs/plans/codified-delivery-loop.md). Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
👀 Quinn is reviewing — verdict (PASS / WARN / FAIL) + findings to follow. |
![protoquinn[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/3282126?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
QA Audit — PR #39 | docs(adr): 0001 — the PM quality flywheel (design only)
VERDICT: PASS (pending CI)
CI Status
- test: queued ⏳ — CI is still settling. The approve-on-green policy promotes this review to APPROVED automatically once every check passes.
Diff Review
- README gains a cross-reference to the new ADR — correctly linked with relative path.
- New ADR 0001 is a clean, well-scoped design document: four crisp decisions (D1–D4), honest about what's deliberately NOT built yet, clear revisit triggers. No code changes; no risk surface.
Observations
- None. Docs-only, well-structured, no blocking concerns.
— Quinn, QA Engineer
|
Submitted COMMENT review on #39. |
|
✅ CI went terminal-green with no blockers on the prior review — promoting it to APPROVED per the approve-on-green policy (#748). |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
M8 of the codified-delivery-loop plan (stretch, design-only). Extends protoAgent ADR 0006's flywheel past "advise" at the PM tier, grounded in the data the M5/M6 gates now produce on every team board.
D1 — rollup grows a bounded per-board
qualityblock (bounce counts by loop, finding category×severity aggregates, ladder burn, design-gate rejections), aggregated board-side — the PM reads aggregates only, never raw findings.D2 — a scheduled
portfolio_retropass diffs quality blocks across boards and emits exactly three output kinds: dispatch policy (PM's own knob), process advice memos (A2A, never config writes), and lessons for the team-side KG flywheel.D3 — humans actuate anything that crosses a team boundary.
D4 — no new store; flywheel state lives in the PM's existing KB.
Implementation is deliberately out of scope until live
review_gate: trueboards have produced real findings data to validate the aggregate shapes against.🤖 Generated with Claude Code