fix: Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 19: Slice memory allocation with excessive size value#9
Merged
Merged
Conversation
… with excessive size value Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Contributor
Reviewer's guide (collapsed on small PRs)Reviewer's GuideHardens the dashboard request logging ring buffer against excessive or invalid slice allocations by clamping constructor and Recent() arguments to explicit size limits, using centralized constants for default and maximum capacity. File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey - I've left some high level feedback:
- In
Recent, consider clamping or early-returning whenn <= 0to avoid surprising behavior or potential panics if a negative value is passed in. - The
n > c.maxSizecheck inRecentmay be redundant ifc.countis already guaranteed to never exceedc.maxSize; if that invariant holds, you could simplify by only clamping toc.count.
Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:
## Overall Comments
- In `Recent`, consider clamping or early-returning when `n <= 0` to avoid surprising behavior or potential panics if a negative value is passed in.
- The `n > c.maxSize` check in `Recent` may be redundant if `c.count` is already guaranteed to never exceed `c.maxSize`; if that invariant holds, you could simplify by only clamping to `c.count`.Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
Early-return on n <= 0 or empty buffer, and remove redundant n > c.maxSize check since c.count is already capped at maxSize.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Potential fix for https://github.com/skyoo2003/devcloud/security/code-scanning/19
General fix: enforce strict upper/lower bounds before any slice allocation that depends on variable size, and ensure constructor parameters cannot create invalid or oversized internal buffers.
Best fix here (without changing intended behavior):
internal/dashboard/logger.go, hardenNewLogCollector(maxSize int)by clamping invalid/oversizedmaxSizeto safe bounds.Recent(n int), clampnnot only toc.countbut also toc.maxSizebefore allocation.This preserves functionality (ring buffer + recent retrieval) while preventing excessive allocations even if callers pass unexpected values.
Suggested fixes powered by Copilot Autofix. Review carefully before merging.